$ oc delete <pv-name>
Azure Red Hat OpenShift 3.11 will be retired 30 June 2022. Support for creation of new Azure Red Hat OpenShift 3.11 clusters continues through 30 November 2020. Following retirement, remaining Azure Red Hat OpenShift 3.11 clusters will be shut down to prevent security vulnerabilities.
Follow this guide to create an Azure Red Hat OpenShift 4 cluster. If you have specific questions, please contact us
Managing storage is a distinct problem from managing compute resources. Azure Red Hat OpenShift uses the Kubernetes persistent volume (PV) framework to allow cluster administrators to provision persistent storage for a cluster. Developers can use persistent volume claims (PVCs) to request PV resources without having specific knowledge of the underlying storage infrastructure.
PVCs are specific to a project and are created and used by developers as a means to use a PV. PV resources on their own are not scoped to any single project; they can be shared across the entire Azure Red Hat OpenShift cluster and claimed from any project. After a PV is bound to a PVC, however, that PV cannot then be bound to additional PVCs. This has the effect of scoping a bound PV to a single namespace (that of the binding project).
PVs are defined by a PersistentVolume
API object, which represents a piece of
existing, networked storage in the cluster that was provisioned by the
cluster administrator. It is a resource in the cluster just like a node is a
cluster resource. PVs are volume plug-ins like Volumes
but have a lifecycle
that is independent of any individual
pod that uses the PV. PV
objects capture the details of the implementation of the storage, be that NFS,
iSCSI, or a cloud-provider-specific storage system.
High availability of storage in the infrastructure is left to the underlying storage provider. |
PVCs are defined by a PersistentVolumeClaim
API object, which represents a
request for storage by a developer. It is similar to a pod in that pods consume
node resources and PVCs consume PV resources. For example, pods can request
specific levels of resources (e.g., CPU and memory), while PVCs can request
specific storage capacity and access
modes (e.g., they can be mounted once read/write or many times read-only).
PVs are resources in the cluster. PVCs are requests for those resources and also act as claim checks to the resource. The interaction between PVs and PVCs have the following lifecycle.
In response to requests from a developer defined in a PVC, a cluster administrator configures one or more dynamic provisioners that provision storage and a matching PV.
Alternatively, a cluster administrator can create a number of PVs in advance that carry the details of the real storage that is available for use. PVs exist in the API and are available for use.
When you create a PVC, you request a specific amount of storage, specify the required access mode, and create a storage class to describe and classify the storage. The control loop in the master watches for new PVCs and binds the new PVC to an appropriate PV. If an appropriate PV does not exist, a provisioner for the storage class creates one.
The PV volume might exceed your requested volume. This is especially true with manually provisioned PVs. To minimize the excess, Azure Red Hat OpenShift binds to the smallest PV that matches all other criteria.
Claims remain unbound indefinitely if a matching volume does not exist or cannot be created with any available provisioner servicing a storage class. Claims are bound as matching volumes become available. For example, a cluster with many manually provisioned 50Gi volumes would not match a PVC requesting 100Gi. The PVC can be bound when a 100Gi PV is added to the cluster.
Pods use claims as volumes. The cluster inspects the claim to find the bound volume and mounts that volume for a pod. For those volumes that support multiple access modes, you must specify which mode applies when you use the claim as a volume in a pod.
After you have a claim and that claim is bound, the bound PV belongs to you
for as long as you need it. You can schedule pods and access claimed
PVs by including persistentVolumeClaim
in the pod’s volumes block. See
below for syntax details.
When you are finished with a volume, you can delete the PVC object from the API, which allows reclamation of the resource. The volume is considered "released" when the claim is deleted, but it is not yet available for another claim. The previous claimant’s data remains on the volume and must be handled according to policy.
The reclaim policy of a PersistentVolume
tells the cluster what to do with
the volume after it is released. A PV’s reclaim policy can be either Retain
or Delete
.
Retain
reclaim policy allows manual reclamation of the resource for those volume plug-ins that support it.
Delete
reclaim policy deletes both the PersistentVolume
object from Azure Red Hat OpenShift and the associated storage asset in external infrastructure, such as AWS eBS, GCe PD, or Cinder volume.
Dynamically provisioned volumes have a default |
When a PersistentVolumeClaim is deleted, the PersistentVolume still exists and is considered "released". However, the PV is not yet available for another claim because the previous claimant’s data remains on the volume.
To manually reclaim the PV as a cluster administrator:
Delete the PV.
$ oc delete <pv-name>
The associated storage asset in the external infrastructure, such as an AWS eBS, GCe PD, Azure Disk, or Cinder volume, still exists after the PV is deleted.
Clean up the data on the associated storage asset.
Delete the associated storage asset. Alternately, to reuse the same storage asset, create a new PV with the storage asset definition.
The reclaimed PV is now available for use by another PVC.
To change the reclaim policy of a PV:
List the PVs in your cluster:
$ oc get pv
NAMe CAPACITY ACCeSSMODeS ReCLAIMPOLICY STATUS CLAIM STORAGeCLASS ReASON AGe
pvc-b6efd8da-b7b5-11e6-9d58-0ed433a7dd94 4Gi RWO Delete Bound default/claim1 manual 10s
pvc-b95650f8-b7b5-11e6-9d58-0ed433a7dd94 4Gi RWO Delete Bound default/claim2 manual 6s
pvc-bb3ca71d-b7b5-11e6-9d58-0ed433a7dd94 4Gi RWO Delete Bound default/claim3 manual 3s
Choose one of your PVs and change its reclaim policy:
$ oc patch pv <your-pv-name> -p '{"spec":{"persistentVolumeReclaimPolicy":"Retain"}}'
Verify that your chosen PV has the right policy:
$ oc get pv
NAMe CAPACITY ACCeSSMODeS ReCLAIMPOLICY STATUS CLAIM STORAGeCLASS ReASON AGe
pvc-b6efd8da-b7b5-11e6-9d58-0ed433a7dd94 4Gi RWO Delete Bound default/claim1 manual 10s
pvc-b95650f8-b7b5-11e6-9d58-0ed433a7dd94 4Gi RWO Delete Bound default/claim2 manual 6s
pvc-bb3ca71d-b7b5-11e6-9d58-0ed433a7dd94 4Gi RWO Retain Bound default/claim3 manual 3s
In the preceding output, the PV bound to claim default/claim3
now has a Retain
reclaim policy. The PV will not be automatically deleted when a user deletes claim default/claim3
.
each PV contains a spec
and status
, which is the specification and
status of the volume, for example:
apiVersion: v1
kind: PersistentVolume
metadata:
name: pv0003
spec:
capacity:
storage: 5Gi
accessModes:
- ReadWriteOnce
persistentVolumeReclaimPolicy: Retain
nfs:
path: /tmp
server: 172.17.0.2
Generally, a PV has a specific storage capacity. This is set by using the PV’s
capacity
attribute.
Currently, storage capacity is the only resource that can be set or requested. Future attributes may include IOPS, throughput, and so on.
A PersistentVolume
can be mounted on a host in any way supported by the
resource provider. Providers will have different capabilities and each PV’s
access modes are set to the specific modes supported by that particular volume.
For example, NFS can support multiple read/write clients, but a specific NFS PV
might be exported on the server as read-only. each PV gets its own set of access
modes describing that specific PV’s capabilities.
Claims are matched to volumes with similar access modes. The only two matching criteria are access modes and size. A claim’s access modes represent a request. Therefore, you might be granted more, but never less. For example, if a claim requests RWO, but the only volume available is an NFS PV (RWO+ROX+RWX), the claim would then match NFS because it supports RWO.
Direct matches are always attempted first. The volume’s modes must match or contain more modes than you requested. The size must be greater than or equal to what is expected. If two types of volumes (NFS and iSCSI, for example) have the same set of access modes, either of them can match a claim with those modes. There is no ordering between types of volumes and no way to choose one type over another.
All volumes with the same modes are grouped, and then sorted by size (smallest to largest). The binder gets the group with matching modes and iterates over each (in size order) until one size matches.
The following table lists the access modes:
Access Mode | CLI abbreviation | Description |
---|---|---|
ReadWriteOnce |
|
The volume can be mounted as read-write by a single node. |
ReadOnlyMany |
|
The volume can be mounted read-only by many nodes. |
ReadWriteMany |
|
The volume can be mounted as read-write by many nodes. |
A volume’s For example, Ceph offers ReadWriteOnce access mode. You must
mark the claims as |
The following table lists the access modes supported by different PVs:
Volume Plug-in | ReadWriteOnce | ReadOnlyMany | ReadWriteMany |
---|---|---|---|
AWS eBS |
✅ |
- |
- |
Azure File |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
Azure Disk |
✅ |
- |
- |
Ceph RBD |
✅ |
✅ |
- |
Fibre Channel |
✅ |
✅ |
- |
GCe Persistent Disk |
✅ |
- |
- |
GlusterFS |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
gluster-block |
✅ |
- |
- |
HostPath |
✅ |
- |
- |
iSCSI |
✅ |
✅ |
- |
NFS |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
Openstack Cinder |
✅ |
- |
- |
VMWare vSphere |
✅ |
- |
- |
Local |
✅ |
- |
- |
Use a recreate deployment strategy for pods that rely on AWS eBS, GCe Persistent Disks, or Openstack Cinder PVs. |
The following restrictions apply when using persistent volumes with Azure Red Hat OpenShift:
Persistent volumes are backed by the following storage classes:
Both of these storage technologies rely on the Azure storage infrastructure. The Azure Red Hat OpenShift Service does not back up persistent volumes and, therefore, recommends using external Services for storing sensitive data or application state. |
The following table lists current reclaim policies:
Reclaim policy | Description |
---|---|
Retain |
Allows manual reclamation. |
Delete |
Deletes both PV and associated external storage asset. |
If you do not want to retain all pods, use dynamic provisioning. |
Volumes can be found in one of the following phases:
Phase | Description |
---|---|
Available |
A free resource not yet bound to a claim. |
Bound |
The volume is bound to a claim. |
Released |
The claim was deleted, but the resource is not yet reclaimed by the cluster. |
Failed |
The volume has failed its automatic reclamation. |
The CLI shows the name of the PVC bound to the PV.
each PVC contains a spec
and status
, which is the specification and
status of the claim, for example:
kind: PersistentVolumeClaim
apiVersion: v1
metadata:
name: myclaim
spec:
accessModes:
- ReadWriteOnce
resources:
requests:
storage: 8Gi
storageClassName: gold
Claims can optionally request a specific storage class by specifying the storage
class’s name in the storageClassName
attribute. Only PVs of the requested
class, ones with the same storageClassName
as the PVC, can be bound to the
PVC. The cluster administrator can configure dynamic provisioners to service one
or more storage classes. The cluster administrator can create a PV on demand
that matches the specifications in the PVC.
The cluster administrator can also set a default storage class for all PVCs.
When a default storage class is configured, the PVC must explicitly ask for
StorageClass
or storageClassName
annotations set to ""
to be bound to a
PV without a storage class.
Claims use the same conventions as volumes when requesting storage with specific access modes.
Claims, such as pods, can request specific quantities of a resource. In this case, the request is for storage. The same resource model applies to volumes and claims.
Pods access storage by using the claim as a volume. Claims must exist in the
same namespace as the pod by using the claim. The cluster finds the claim in the
pod’s namespace and uses it to get the PersistentVolume
backing the claim.
The volume is mounted to the host and into the pod, for example:
kind: Pod
apiVersion: v1
metadata:
name: mypod
spec:
containers:
- name: myfrontend
image: dockerfile/nginx
volumeMounts:
- mountPath: "/var/www/html"
name: mypd
volumes:
- name: mypd
persistentVolumeClaim:
claimName: myclaim