This is a cache of https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.6/architecture/admission-plug-ins.html. It is a snapshot of the page at 2024-11-25T23:03:08.078+0000.
Admission plug-ins | Architecture | OpenShift Container Platform 4.6
    OpenShift docs are moving and will soon only be available at docs.redhat.com, the home of all Red Hat product documentation. Explore the new docs experience today.
  1. Documentation
    2. history
×

Admission plug-ins

About admission plug-ins

Admission plug-ins are used to help regulate how OpenShift Container Platform 4.6 functions. Admission plug-ins intercept requests to the master API to validate resource requests and ensure policies are adhered to, after the request is authenticated and authorized. For example, they are commonly used to enforce security policy, resource limitations or configuration requirements.

Admission plug-ins run in sequence as an admission chain. If any admission plug-in in the sequence rejects a request, the whole chain is aborted and an error is returned.

OpenShift Container Platform has a default set of admission plug-ins enabled for each resource type. These are required for proper functioning of the cluster. Admission plug-ins ignore resources that they are not responsible for.

In addition to the defaults, the admission chain can be extended dynamically through webhook admission plug-ins that call out to custom webhook servers. There are two types of webhook admission plug-ins: a mutating admission plug-in and a validating admission plug-in. The mutating admission plug-in runs first and can both modify resources and validate requests. The validating admission plug-in validates requests and runs after the mutating admission plug-in so that modifications triggered by the mutating admission plug-in can also be validated.

Calling webhook servers through a mutating admission plug-in can produce side effects on resources related to the target object. In such situations, you must take steps to validate that the end result is as expected.

Dynamic admission should be used cautiously because it impacts cluster control plane operations. When calling webhook servers through webhook admission plug-ins in OpenShift Container Platform 4.6, ensure that you have read the documentation fully and tested for side effects of mutations. Include steps to restore resources back to their original state prior to mutation, in the event that a request does not pass through the entire admission chain.

Default admission plug-ins

Default validating and admission plug-ins are enabled in OpenShift Container Platform 4.6. These default plug-ins contribute to fundamental control plane functionality, such as ingress policy, cluster resource limit override and quota policy. The following lists contain the default admission plug-ins:

Validating admission plug-ins

  • LimitRanger

  • serviceAccount

  • PodNodeSelector

  • Priority

  • PodTolerationRestriction

  • OwnerReferencesPermissionEnforcement

  • PersistentVolumeClaimResize

  • RuntimeClass

  • CertificateApproval

  • CertificateSigning

  • CertificateSubjectRestriction

  • autoscaling.openshift.io/ManagementCPUsOverride

  • authorization.openshift.io/RestrictSubjectBindings

  • scheduling.openshift.io/OriginPodNodeEnvironment

  • network.openshift.io/ExternalIPRanger

  • network.openshift.io/RestrictedEndpointsAdmission

  • image.openshift.io/ImagePolicy

  • security.openshift.io/SecurityContextConstraint

  • security.openshift.io/SCCExecRestrictions

  • route.openshift.io/IngressAdmission

  • config.openshift.io/ValidateAPIServer

  • config.openshift.io/ValidateAuthentication

  • config.openshift.io/ValidateFeatureGate

  • config.openshift.io/ValidateConsole

  • operator.openshift.io/ValidateDNS

  • config.openshift.io/ValidateImage

  • config.openshift.io/ValidateOAuth

  • config.openshift.io/ValidateProject

  • config.openshift.io/DenyDeleteClusterConfiguration

  • config.openshift.io/ValidateScheduler

  • quota.openshift.io/ValidateClusterResourceQuota

  • security.openshift.io/ValidateSecurityContextConstraints

  • authorization.openshift.io/ValidateRoleBindingRestriction

  • config.openshift.io/ValidateNetwork

  • operator.openshift.io/ValidateKubeControllerManager

  • ValidatingAdmissionWebhook

  • ResourceQuota

  • quota.openshift.io/ClusterResourceQuota

Mutating admission plug-ins

  • NamespaceLifecycle

  • LimitRanger

  • serviceAccount

  • NodeRestriction

  • TaintNodesByCondition

  • PodNodeSelector

  • Priority

  • DefaultTolerationSeconds

  • PodTolerationRestriction

  • PersistentVolumeLabel

  • DefaultStorageClass

  • StorageObjectInUseProtection

  • RuntimeClass

  • DefaultIngressClass

  • autoscaling.openshift.io/ManagementCPUsOverride

  • scheduling.openshift.io/OriginPodNodeEnvironment

  • image.openshift.io/ImagePolicy

  • security.openshift.io/SecurityContextConstraint

  • security.openshift.io/DefaultSecurityContextConstraints

  • MutatingAdmissionWebhook

Webhook admission plug-ins

In addition to OpenShift Container Platform default admission plug-ins, dynamic admission can be implemented through webhook admission plug-ins that call webhook servers, in order to extend the functionality of the admission chain. Webhook servers are called over HTTP at defined endpoints.

There are two types of webhook admission plug-ins in OpenShift Container Platform:

  • During the admission process, the mutating admission plug-in can perform tasks, such as injecting affinity labels.

  • At the end of the admission process, the validating admission plug-in can be used to make sure an object is configured properly, for example ensuring affinity labels are as expected. If the validation passes, OpenShift Container Platform schedules the object as configured.

When an API request comes in, mutating or validating admission plug-ins use the list of external webhooks in the configuration and call them in parallel:

  • If all of the webhooks approve the request, the admission chain continues.

  • If any of the webhooks deny the request, the admission request is denied and the reason for doing so is based on the first denial.

  • If more than one webhook denies the admission request, only the first denial reason is returned to the user.

  • If an error is encountered when calling a webhook, the request is either denied or the webhook is ignored depending on the error policy set. If the error policy is set to Ignore, the request is unconditionally accepted in the event of a failure. If the policy is set to Fail, failed requests are denied. Using Ignore can result in unpredictable behavior for all clients.

Communication between the webhook admission plug-in and the webhook server must use TLS. Generate a CA certificate and use the certificate to sign the server certificate that is used by your webhook admission server. The PEM-encoded CA certificate is supplied to the webhook admission plug-in using a mechanism, such as service serving certificate secrets.

The following diagram illustrates the sequential admission chain process within which multiple webhook servers are called.

API admission stage
Figure 1. API admission chain with mutating and validating admission plug-ins

An example webhook admission plug-in use case is where all pods must have a common set of labels. In this example, the mutating admission plug-in can inject labels and the validating admission plug-in can check that labels are as expected. OpenShift Container Platform would subsequently schedule pods that include required labels and reject those that do not.

Some common webhook admission plug-in use cases include:

  • Namespace reservation.

  • Limiting custom network resources managed by the SR-IOV network device plug-in.

  • Defining tolerations that enable taints to qualify which pods should be scheduled on a node.

  • Pod priority class validation.

Types of webhook admission plug-ins

Cluster administrators can call out to webhook servers through the mutating admission plug-in or the validating admission plug-in in the API server admission chain.

Mutating admission plug-in

The mutating admission plug-in is invoked during the mutation phase of the admission process, which allows modification of resource content before it is persisted. One example webhook that can be called through the mutating admission plug-in is the Pod Node Selector feature, which uses an annotation on a namespace to find a label selector and add it to the pod specification.

Sample mutating admission plug-in configuration
apiVersion: admissionregistration.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: MutatingWebhookConfiguration (1)
metadata:
  name: <webhook_name> (2)
webhooks:
- name: <webhook_name> (3)
  clientConfig: (4)
    service:
      namespace: default (5)
      name: kubernetes (6)
      path: <webhook_url> (7)
    caBundle: <ca_signing_certificate> (8)
  rules: (9)
  - operations: (10)
    - <operation>
    apiGroups:
    - ""
    apiVersions:
    - "*"
    resources:
    - <resource>
  failurePolicy: <policy> (11)
  sideEffects: None
1 Specifies a mutating admission plug-in configuration.
2 The name for the MutatingWebhookConfiguration object. Replace <webhook_name> with the appropriate value.
3 The name of the webhook to call. Replace <webhook_name> with the appropriate value.
4 Information about how to connect to, trust, and send data to the webhook server.
5 The namespace where the front-end service is created.
6 The name of the front-end service.
7 The webhook URL used for admission requests. Replace <webhook_url> with the appropriate value.
8 A PEM-encoded CA certificate that signs the server certificate that is used by the webhook server. Replace <ca_signing_certificate> with the appropriate certificate in base64 format.
9 Rules that define when the API server should use this webhook admission plug-in.
10 One or more operations that trigger the API server to call this webhook admission plug-in. Possible values are create, update, delete or connect. Replace <operation> and <resource> with the appropriate values.
11 Specifies how the policy should proceed if the webhook server is unavailable. Replace <policy> with either Ignore (to unconditionally accept the request in the event of a failure) or Fail (to deny the failed request). Using Ignore can result in unpredictable behavior for all clients.

In OpenShift Container Platform 4.6, objects created by users or control loops through a mutating admission plug-in might return unexpected results, especially if values set in an initial request are overwritten, which is not recommended.

Validating admission plug-in

A validating admission plug-in is invoked during the validation phase of the admission process. This phase allows the enforcement of invariants on particular API resources to ensure that the resource does not change again. The Pod Node Selector is also an example of a webhook which is called by the validating admission plug-in, to ensure that all nodeSelector fields are constrained by the node selector restrictions on the namespace.

Sample validating admission plug-in configuration
apiVersion: admissionregistration.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: ValidatingWebhookConfiguration (1)
metadata:
  name: <webhook_name> (2)
webhooks:
- name: <webhook_name> (3)
  clientConfig: (4)
    service:
      namespace: default  (5)
      name: kubernetes (6)
      path: <webhook_url> (7)
    caBundle: <ca_signing_certificate> (8)
  rules: (9)
  - operations: (10)
    - <operation>
    apiGroups:
    - ""
    apiVersions:
    - "*"
    resources:
    - <resource>
  failurePolicy: <policy> (11)
  sideEffects: Unknown
1 Specifies a validating admission plug-in configuration.
2 The name for the ValidatingWebhookConfiguration object. Replace <webhook_name> with the appropriate value.
3 The name of the webhook to call. Replace <webhook_name> with the appropriate value.
4 Information about how to connect to, trust, and send data to the webhook server.
5 The namespace where the front-end service is created.
6 The name of the front-end service.
7 The webhook URL used for admission requests. Replace <webhook_url> with the appropriate value.
8 A PEM-encoded CA certificate that signs the server certificate that is used by the webhook server. Replace <ca_signing_certificate> with the appropriate certificate in base64 format.
9 Rules that define when the API server should use this webhook admission plug-in.
10 One or more operations that trigger the API server to call this webhook admission plug-in. Possible values are create, update, delete or connect. Replace <operation> and <resource> with the appropriate values.
11 Specifies how the policy should proceed if the webhook server is unavailable. Replace <policy> with either Ignore (to unconditionally accept the request in the event of a failure) or Fail (to deny the failed request). Using Ignore can result in unpredictable behavior for all clients.

Configuring dynamic admission

This procedure outlines high-level steps to configure dynamic admission. The functionality of the admission chain is extended by configuring a webhook admission plug-in to call out to a webhook server.

The webhook server is also configured as an aggregated API server. This allows other OpenShift Container Platform components to communicate with the webhook using internal credentials and facilitates testing using the oc command. Additionally, this enables role based access control (RBAC) into the webhook and prevents token information from other API servers from being disclosed to the webhook.

Prerequisites

  • An OpenShift Container Platform account with cluster administrator access.

  • The OpenShift Container Platform CLI (oc) installed.

  • A published webhook server container image.

Procedure

  1. Build a webhook server container image and make it available to the cluster using an image registry.

  2. Create a local CA key and certificate and use them to sign the webhook server’s certificate signing request (CSR).

  3. Create a new project for webhook resources:

    $ oc new-project my-webhook-namespace  (1)
    1 Note that the webhook server might expect a specific name.

  4. Define RBAC rules for the aggregated API service in a file called rbac.yaml:

    apiVersion: v1
kind: List
items:

- apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1  (1)
  kind: ClusterRoleBinding
  metadata:
    name: auth-delegator-my-webhook-namespace
  roleRef:
    kind: ClusterRole
    apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
    name: system:auth-delegator
  subjects:
  - kind: serviceAccount
    namespace: my-webhook-namespace
    name: server

- apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1  (2)
  kind: ClusterRole
  metadata:
    annotations:
    name: system:openshift:online:my-webhook-server
  rules:
  - apiGroups:
    - online.openshift.io
    resources:
    - namespacereservations  (3)
    verbs:
    - get
    - list
    - watch

- apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1  (4)
  kind: ClusterRole
  metadata:
    name: system:openshift:online:my-webhook-requester
  rules:
  - apiGroups:
    - admission.online.openshift.io
    resources:
    - namespacereservations (5)
    verbs:
    - create

- apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1  (6)
  kind: ClusterRoleBinding
  metadata:
    name: my-webhook-server-my-webhook-namespace
  roleRef:
    kind: ClusterRole
    apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
    name: system:openshift:online:my-webhook-server
  subjects:
  - kind: serviceAccount
    namespace: my-webhook-namespace
    name: server

- apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1  (7)
  kind: RoleBinding
  metadata:
    namespace: kube-system
    name: extension-server-authentication-reader-my-webhook-namespace
  roleRef:
    kind: Role
    apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
    name: extension-apiserver-authentication-reader
  subjects:
  - kind: serviceAccount
    namespace: my-webhook-namespace
    name: server

- apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1  (8)
  kind: ClusterRole
  metadata:
    name: my-cluster-role
  rules:
  - apiGroups:
    - admissionregistration.k8s.io
    resources:
    - validatingwebhookconfigurations
    - mutatingwebhookconfigurations
    verbs:
    - get
    - list
    - watch
  - apiGroups:
    - ""
    resources:
    - namespaces
    verbs:
    - get
    - list
    - watch

- apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
  kind: ClusterRoleBinding
  metadata:
    name: my-cluster-role
  roleRef:
    kind: ClusterRole
    apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
    name: my-cluster-role
  subjects:
  - kind: serviceAccount
    namespace: my-webhook-namespace
    name: server
    1 Delegates authentication and authorization to the webhook server API.
    2 Allows the webhook server to access cluster resources.
    3 Points to resources. This example points to the namespacereservations resource.
    4 Enables the aggregated API server to create admission reviews.
    5 Points to resources. This example points to the namespacereservations resource.
    6 Enables the webhook server to access cluster resources.
    7 Role binding to read the configuration for terminating authentication.
    8 Default cluster role and cluster role bindings for an aggregated API server.

  5. Apply those RBAC rules to the cluster:

    $ oc auth reconcile -f rbac.yaml

  6. Create a YAML file called webhook-daemonset.yaml that is used to deploy a webhook as a daemon set server in a namespace:

    apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: DaemonSet
metadata:
  namespace: my-webhook-namespace
  name: server
  labels:
    server: "true"
spec:
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      server: "true"
  template:
    metadata:
      name: server
      labels:
        server: "true"
    spec:
      serviceAccountName: server
      containers:
      - name: my-webhook-container  (1)
        image: <image_registry_username>/<image_path>:<tag>  (2)
        imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent
        command:
        - <container_commands>  (3)
        ports:
        - containerPort: 8443 (4)
        volumeMounts:
        - mountPath: /var/serving-cert
          name: serving-cert
        readinessProbe:
          httpGet:
            path: /healthz
            port: 8443 (5)
            scheme: HTTPS
      volumes:
      - name: serving-cert
        secret:
          defaultMode: 420
          secretName: server-serving-cert
    1 Note that the webhook server might expect a specific container name.
    2 Points to a webhook server container image. Replace <image_registry_username>/<image_path>:<tag> with the appropriate value.
    3 Specifies webhook container run commands. Replace <container_commands> with the appropriate value.
    4 Defines the target port within pods. This example uses port 8443.
    5 Specifies the port used by the readiness probe. This example uses port 8443.

  7. Deploy the daemon set:

    $ oc apply -f webhook-daemonset.yaml

  8. Define a secret for the service serving certificate signer, within a YAML file called webhook-secret.yaml:

    apiVersion: v1
kind: Secret
metadata:
  namespace: my-webhook-namespace
  name: server-serving-cert
type: kubernetes.io/tls
data:
  tls.crt: <server_certificate>  (1)
  tls.key: <server_key>  (2)
    1 References the signed webhook server certificate. Replace <server_certificate> with the appropriate certificate in base64 format.
    2 References the signed webhook server key. Replace <server_key> with the appropriate key in base64 format.

  9. Create the secret:

    $ oc apply -f webhook-secret.yaml

  10. Define a service account and service, within a YAML file called webhook-service.yaml:

    apiVersion: v1
kind: List
items:

- apiVersion: v1
  kind: serviceAccount
  metadata:
    namespace: my-webhook-namespace
    name: server

- apiVersion: v1
  kind: service
  metadata:
    namespace: my-webhook-namespace
    name: server
    annotations:
      service.beta.openshift.io/serving-cert-secret-name: server-serving-cert
  spec:
    selector:
      server: "true"
    ports:
    - port: 443  (1)
      targetPort: 8443  (2)
    1 Defines the port that the service listens on. This example uses port 443.
    2 Defines the target port within pods that the service forwards connections to. This example uses port 8443.

  11. Expose the webhook server within the cluster:

    $ oc apply -f webhook-service.yaml

  12. Define a custom resource definition for the webhook server, in a file called webhook-crd.yaml:

    apiVersion: apiextensions.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: CustomResourceDefinition
metadata:
  name: namespacereservations.online.openshift.io  (1)
spec:
  group: online.openshift.io  (2)
  version: v1alpha1  (3)
  scope: Cluster  (4)
  names:
    plural: namespacereservations  (5)
    singular: namespacereservation  (6)
    kind: NamespaceReservation  (7)
    1 Reflects CustomResourceDefinition spec values and is in the format <plural>.<group>. This example uses the namespacereservations resource.
    2 REST API group name.
    3 REST API version name.
    4 Accepted values are Namespaced or Cluster.
    5 Plural name to be included in URL.
    6 Alias seen in oc output.
    7 The reference for resource manifests.

  13. Apply the custom resource definition:

    $ oc apply -f webhook-crd.yaml

  14. Configure the webhook server also as an aggregated API server, within a file called webhook-api-service.yaml:

    apiVersion: apiregistration.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: APIservice
metadata:
  name: v1beta1.admission.online.openshift.io
spec:
  caBundle: <ca_signing_certificate>  (1)
  group: admission.online.openshift.io
  groupPriorityMinimum: 1000
  versionPriority: 15
  service:
    name: server
    namespace: my-webhook-namespace
  version: v1beta1
    1 A PEM-encoded CA certificate that signs the server certificate that is used by the webhook server. Replace <ca_signing_certificate> with the appropriate certificate in base64 format.

  15. Deploy the aggregated API service:

    $ oc apply -f webhook-api-service.yaml

  16. Define the webhook admission plug-in configuration within a file called webhook-config.yaml. This example uses the validating admission plug-in:

    apiVersion: admissionregistration.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: ValidatingWebhookConfiguration
metadata:
  name: namespacereservations.admission.online.openshift.io  (1)
webhooks:
- name: namespacereservations.admission.online.openshift.io  (2)
  clientConfig:
    service:  (3)
      namespace: default
      name: kubernetes
      path: /apis/admission.online.openshift.io/v1beta1/namespacereservations  (4)
    caBundle: <ca_signing_certificate>  (5)
  rules:
  - operations:
    - CREATE
    apiGroups:
    - project.openshift.io
    apiVersions:
    - "*"
    resources:
    - projectrequests
  - operations:
    - CREATE
    apiGroups:
    - ""
    apiVersions:
    - "*"
    resources:
    - namespaces
  failurePolicy: Fail
    1 Name for the ValidatingWebhookConfiguration object. This example uses the namespacereservations resource.
    2 Name of the webhook to call. This example uses the namespacereservations resource.
    3 Enables access to the webhook server through the aggregated API.
    4 The webhook URL used for admission requests. This example uses the namespacereservation resource.
    5 A PEM-encoded CA certificate that signs the server certificate that is used by the webhook server. Replace <ca_signing_certificate> with the appropriate certificate in base64 format.

  17. Deploy the webhook:

    $ oc apply -f webhook-config.yaml

  18. Verify that the webhook is functioning as expected. For example, if you have configured dynamic admission to reserve specific namespaces, confirm that requests to create those namespaces are rejected and that requests to create non-reserved namespaces succeed.

Additional resources